Search for: "State of Hawaii Securities Enforcement Branch" Results 1 - 20 of 92
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jul 2017, 2:17 pm by Lyle Denniston
Lawyers for the state of Hawaii, arguing that the Trump Administration is “imposing a new Muslim ban wholly divorced from any national security rationale,” urged a federal appeals court on Friday to take steps to ensure that more foreign nationals and refugees get to enter the United States in coming weeks and months. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 5:16 am by Amira Mikhail, Jordan Brunner
The court determines that the order also impairs Hawaii’s sovereign interests in carrying out its refugee policies, as well as its ability to create and enforce its local laws that protect equal rights, prohibit discrimination, and fostering diversity. [read post]
6 Aug 2022, 7:25 am by Ilya Somin
Reece describes ways in which all three branches of government can begin to make up for their awful record in this field: All three branches of government could act to end racial profiling in the United States. [read post]
In two state supreme court rulings published Tuesday, jurists in Massachusetts and Hawaii created new space for the expansion of privacy rights under their state constitutions. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 6:39 am by Joy Waltemath
“The district court has issued decisions that are entrusted to the Executive Branch, undermined national security, delayed necessary action, created confusion, and violated a proper respect for separation of powers. [read post]
17 Feb 2020, 1:27 pm by Ilya Somin
Hawaii, the Court accepted a highly dubious national security rationale without any meaningful scrutiny. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 12:35 pm by Steve Vladeck
Removing that tool from the executive branch does not serve our national security. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 8:35 am by Jane Chong
Read the Maryland (pp. 35-36) and Hawaii (pp. 37-38) decisions enjoining enforcement of the second order—specifically, those portions addressing the plaintiffs’ Establishment Clause claims—and note how the central question is being framed: either protecting national security is the primary, secular purpose for the travel ban, as reflected in the order’s explicit focus on the United States’ poor diplomatic relations… [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 7:27 pm by Josh Blackman
Rather, the only parties that could bring the claim are the alien’s associates (relative or organization) within the United States. [read post]
18 Oct 2017, 2:14 pm by Madeline Henshaw-Greene
This marks the third time that the government will have to go to court against the state of Hawaii in order to defend its directive. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 1:16 pm by Lorenzo d’Aubert, Eric Halliday
Hawaii (2018), which upheld Trump’s executive order banning entry of certain immigrants from majority Muslim nations. [read post]
3 Sep 2021, 5:01 am by Peter Margulies
Rather than an agreement entered into at arm’s length and in good faith, the agreement seemed much more like an effort by Trump’s handpicked Homeland Security official and pro-immigration-enforcement Texas state officials to tie the Biden administration’s hands. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 1:53 pm by Jacob Sapochnick
This prompted the State of Hawaii to seek clarification from federal judge Watson, regarding what types of familial relationships would be subject to the ban. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 1:57 pm by Amy Howe
A federal court in Washington state blocked the Trump administration from enforcing the order, and the U.S. [read post]
10 May 2018, 10:15 am
Hawaii, the challenge to President Trump’s so-called “Muslim ban. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 6:07 pm by Amy Howe
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit that largely upheld a Hawaii district court’s ruling barring the government from enforcing the ban. [read post]